add share buttonsSoftshare button powered by web designing, website development company in India

Home » Health and Fitness » How to spot bad science?

How to spot bad science?

PodChatLive is a once a month live show for the frequent education of Podiatry practitioners which uses the Facebook livestream to get to their audience. Even though it is typically watched by podiatrists, lots of other health care professionals in addition watch it. The stream is put on by Craig Payne from Australia and Ian Griffiths from the United Kingdom. The show is broadcast live on Facebook and then is later on modified and submitted to YouTube. Each live event has a different guest or group of experts to discuss a unique area of interest each time. Inquiries are answered during the stream by the hosts and experts throughout the live show on Facebook. In addition, there is a audio only edition of each show on iTunes as well as Spotify as well as the other common podcast sources. PodChatLive has gained a huge following that continues to grow. PodChatLive is regarded as one of the ways through which podiatry practitioners may get free continuing education credits.

A topic which can come through commonly in each episode is the thinking scientifically and the challenging of people who present pseudoscience or junk science ideas. They even had one episode focused on the entire topic of bad science in podiatry. In that episode the expert that they had on that week was the podiatrist, Robert Issacs in which they reviewed and tackled the key reason why critical thinking was so essential in clinical practice and how our biases affect logical thinking. Furthermore they discussed basically why it's very vital that you have the ability and need to question and analyze almost everything we read and why this can be so essential to improving the whole profession of Podiatry. They even talked about the most popular logical fallacies and mistakes which occur with that thinking. They also outlined the types of behaviours noticed from certain kinds of individuals in the profession should they be inquired or challenged and how they react to those questions and challenges when caught out.